Incorrectly accounting for taste heterogeneity in choice experiments: Does it really matter for welfare measurement?

Catalina M. Torres Figuerola, Nick Hanley and Sergio Colombo

No 2011/1, CRE Working Papers (Documents de treball del CRE) from Centre de Recerca Econòmica (UIB ·"Sa Nostra")

Abstract: A range of empirical approaches to representing preference heterogeneity have emerged in choice modelling. Researchers have been able to explore the differences which selection of a particular approach makes to welfare measures in a particular dataset, and indeed have been able to implement a number of tests for which approach best fits a particular set of data. However, the question as to the degree of error in welfare estimation from an inappropriate choice of empirical approach has not been addressed. In this paper, we use Monte Carlo analysis to address this question. Given the high popularity of both the random parameter logit (RPL) and latent class models among choice modellers, we examine the errors in welfare estimates from using the incorrect model to account for taste heterogeneity. Our main finding is that using an RPL specification with log-normally distributed preferences seems the best bet.

Keywords: Preference heterogeneity; welfare measurement; accuracy; efficiency; choice experiments; Monte Carlo analysis (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 16 pages
Date: 2011
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-cwa, nep-dcm and nep-ecm
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Published in 'Documents de Treball CRE', 2011, pages 1-16

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.cre.uib.es/internet/cre.nsf/pernomcurt/ ... f/$FILE/dt2011_1.pdf (application/pdf)
Our link check indicates that this URL is bad, the error code is: 500 Can't connect to www.cre.uib.es:80 (No such host is known. )

Related works:
Working Paper: Incorrectly accounting for taste heterogeneity in choice experiments: Does it really matter for welfare measurement? (2011)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pdm:wpaper:2011/1

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in CRE Working Papers (Documents de treball del CRE) from Centre de Recerca Econòmica (UIB ·"Sa Nostra") Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Centre de Recerca Econòmica (UIB ·"Sa Nostra") ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).