EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Incorrectly accounting for taste heterogeneity in choice experiments: Does it really matter for welfare measurement?

Sergio Colombo, Nick Hanley and Catalina M. Torres Figuerola

No 2011-02, Stirling Economics Discussion Papers from University of Stirling, Division of Economics

Abstract: A range of empirical approaches to representing preference heterogeneity have emerged in choice modelling. Researchers have been able to explore the differences which selection of a particular approach makes to welfare measures in a particular dataset, and indeed have been able to implement a number of tests for which approach best fits a particular set of data. However, the question as to the degree of error in welfare estimation from an inappropriate choice of empirical approach has not been addressed. In this paper, we use Monte Carlo analysis to address this question. Given the high popularity of both the random parameter logit (RPL) and latent class models among choice modellers, we examine the errors in welfare estimates from using the incorrect model to account for taste preference heterogeneity. Our main finding is that using an RPL specification with log-normally distributed preferences seems the best bet.

Keywords: Monte Carlo analysis; choice experiments; efficiency; accuracy; welfare measurement,; preference heterogeneity (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2011-02
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-dcm
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/1893/2720

Related works:
Working Paper: Incorrectly accounting for taste heterogeneity in choice experiments: Does it really matter for welfare measurement? (2011) Downloads
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:stl:stledp:2011-02

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Stirling Economics Discussion Papers from University of Stirling, Division of Economics Division of Economics, University of Stirling, Stirling, Scotland FK9 4LA. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Liam Delaney ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).

 
Page updated 2025-04-01
Handle: RePEc:stl:stledp:2011-02