EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Experimenter Demand Effects

Lise Vesterlund ()

No 6384, Working Paper from Department of Economics, University of Pittsburgh

Abstract: A study's internal and external validity is threatened by experimenter demand effects. This threat is taken seriously by experimental economists, who have developed a number of best practices to suppress or eliminate the potential role of such effects. We outline these best practices and review the literature to show that they are followed in the vast majority of published work. This adherence to best practice likely contributes to the limited evidence of experimenter demand effects uncovered in the literature. Specifically, we are not aware of examples where demand effects have been shown to influence the qualitative inference from a study. While good design goes a long way towards reducing the potential for experimenter demand effects, a complementary option, presented in our final section, is to derive bounds on the effect.

Date: 2018-01
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.econ.pitt.edu/sites/default/files/work ... 0coverpage.18.08.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pit:wpaper:6384

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Paper from Department of Economics, University of Pittsburgh Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Department of Economics, University of Pittsburgh ().

 
Page updated 2019-10-03
Handle: RePEc:pit:wpaper:6384