King, Fuller and Dworkin on Natural Law and Hard Cases

Muhammad Mustafa Rashid

MPRA Paper from University Library of Munich, Germany

Abstract: The debate between natural law and positivist law has been received much attention. Ronald Dworkin exposes the limitation of positivist law through the argument of hard cases. This argument is furthered strengthened when we apply the interpretation of Martin Luther King Jr and the voluntarist natural law tradition, and Lon Fuller’s ‘procedural view’ and the application of the ‘principles of legality’.

Keywords: B40; K1; K4; K40; L6; M10; P00; P16; Z18 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: B40 K1 K4 K40 M10 P00 P16 Z12 Z18 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2017-05-19, Revised 2020-05-19
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/100958/1/MPRA_paper_100958.pdf original version (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pra:mprapa:100958

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in MPRA Paper from University Library of Munich, Germany Ludwigstraße 33, D-80539 Munich, Germany. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Joachim Winter ().