Collective Bargaining and Job Benefits: The Case of Florida Deputy Sheriffs

William M. Doerner and William G. Doerner
Authors registered in the RePEc Author Service: William M. Doerner

MPRA Paper from University Library of Munich, Germany

Abstract: In 2003, the Florida Supreme Court lifted the ban that prohibited sheriff deputies from engaging in collective bargaining. Borrowing data from the Criminal Justice Agency Profile, an annual census of Florida law enforcement agencies, enables this study to entertain two questions. First, what impact did the decision have on job benefits? Second, would restricting analysis to agencies with 100+ sworn members alter the findings? Fixed-effects panel data analyses reveal a noteworthy effect on starting salaries. Focusing on just larger agencies leads to a dramatic underestimation of the decision’s impact. The timeliness of this study is appraised in light of pending federal legislation.

Keywords: collective bargaining; unionization; salary; job benefits; Florida (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: H40 H76 J50 K0 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2009-12, Revised 2010-05
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Published in Police Quarterly 13.4(2010): pp. 367-386

Downloads: (external link)
https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/86546/1/MPRA_paper_86546.pdf original version (application/pdf)

Related works:
Working Paper: Collective Bargaining and Job Benefits: The Case of Florida Deputy Sheriffs (2010)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pra:mprapa:86546

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in MPRA Paper from University Library of Munich, Germany Ludwigstraße 33, D-80539 Munich, Germany. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Joachim Winter ().