The revelation principle does not always hold when strategies of agents are costly

Haoyang Wu ()

MPRA Paper from University Library of Munich, Germany

Abstract: The revelation principle asserts that for any indirect mechanism and equilibrium, there is a corresponding direct mechanism with truth as an equilibrium. Although the revelation principle has been a fundamental theorem in the theory of mechanism design for a long time, so far the costs related to strategic actions of agents spent in a mechanism have not been fully discussed. In this paper, we investigate the correctness of the revelation principle when strategies of agents are costly. We point out two key results: (1) The strategic action of each agent in a direct mechanism is just to report a type. Each agent does not need to take any other action to prove himself that his reported type is truthful, and should not play any strategic action as chosen in an indirect mechanism. Hence in a direct mechanism, each agent should not spend strategic costs occurred in an indirect mechanism (see Proposition 1); (2) When strategic costs cannot be neglected in the indirect mechanism, the proof of revelation principle given in Proposition 23.D.1 of the book ``A. Mas-Colell, M.D. Whinston and J.R. Green, Microeconomic Theory, Oxford University Press, 1995'' is wrong (see Proposition 2). We construct a simple labor model to show that a Bayesian implementable social choice function is not truthfully implementable (see Proposition 4), which contradicts the revelation principle.

Keywords: Revelation principle; Game theory; Mechanism design. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D71 D8 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018-08-01
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/88321/1/MPRA_paper_88321.pdf original version (application/pdf)
https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/88794/1/MPRA_paper_88794.pdf revised version (application/pdf)
https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/89257/1/MPRA_paper_89257.pdf revised version (application/pdf)
https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/89444/1/MPRA_paper_89444.pdf revised version (application/pdf)
https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/89601/1/MPRA_paper_89601.pdf revised version (application/pdf)
https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/93088/1/MPRA_paper_93088.pdf revised version (application/pdf)
https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/93325/1/MPRA_paper_93325.pdf revised version (application/pdf)
https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/93503/1/MPRA_paper_93503.pdf revised version (application/pdf)

Related works:
Working Paper: The revelation principle does not always hold when strategies of agents are costly (2018)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pra:mprapa:88321

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in MPRA Paper from University Library of Munich, Germany Ludwigstraße 33, D-80539 Munich, Germany. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Joachim Winter ().