What Are Food Stamps Worth?
Diane Whitmore
Additional contact information
Diane Whitmore: Princeton University
Authors registered in the RePEc Author Service: Diane Whitmore Schanzenbach
No 847, Working Papers from Princeton University, Department of Economics, Industrial Relations Section.
Abstract:
The carte-blanche principle implies that food stamp recipients would be better off if they were given cash instead of an equivalent amount in food stamps. I estimate the cash-equivalent value of food stamps and the lowest price a recipient would accept to sell her "extra" food stamps on the underground market. I estimate that between 20 and 30 percent of food stamp recipients spend less on food than their food stamp benefit amount if they receive cash instead of stamps, and therefore would be better off with cash. Using a theoretical model I present and data from experiments conducted in two states, I estimate that on average "distorted" food stamp recipients value their total benefits at 80 percent of their face value. Aggregating over recipients, the annual deadweight loss associated with the food stamp program is one-half billion dollars. Food diary data indicate that providing cash instead of stamps causes some distorted recipients to decrease their food spending - especially on soda and juice - but has no negative consequence for nutrition. As predicted by theory, inframarginal food stamp recipients do not alter their behavior if they are given cash instead of food stamps. Although paying in-kind benefits results in some deadweight loss, it is thought that an underground market for the excess stamps will be created to alleviate some of the loss. I present new survey evidence indicating that stamps trade for only about 65 percent of their face value on the underground market.
JEL-codes: Q29 Q3 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2002-07
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (29)
Downloads: (external link)
https://dataspace.princeton.edu/bitstream/88435/dsp01z603qx42c/1/468.pdf
Our link check indicates that this URL is bad, the error code is: 500 Internal Server Error
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pri:indrel:468
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Working Papers from Princeton University, Department of Economics, Industrial Relations Section. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Bobray Bordelon ().