Regression Discontinuity Designs in Economics

David Lee and Thomas Lemieux
Additional contact information
David Lee: Princeton University and NBER

No 1118, Working Papers from Princeton University, Department of Economics, Industrial Relations Section.

Abstract: This paper provides an introduction and "user guide" to Regression Discontinuity (RD) designs for empirical researchers. It presents the basic theory behind the research design, details when RD is likely to be valid or invalid given economic incentives, explains why it is considered a "quasi-experimental" design, and summarizes different ways (with their advantages and disadvantages) of estimating RD designs and the limitations of interpreting these estimates. Concepts are discussed using using examples drawn from the growing body of empirical research using RD.

Keywords: Regression Discontinuity; research design; incentives (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C01 C60 H30 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2009-02
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (178)

Downloads: (external link)
https://dataspace.princeton.edu/bitstream/88435/dsp015138jd866/1/548.pdf
Our link check indicates that this URL is bad, the error code is: 500 Internal Server Error

Related works:
Journal Article: Regression Discontinuity Designs in Economics (2010)
Working Paper: Regression Discontinuity Designs in Economics (2009)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pri:indrel:548

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from Princeton University, Department of Economics, Industrial Relations Section. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Bobray Bordelon ().