Regression Discontinuity Designs in Economics

David S. Lee and Thomas Lemieux

Journal of Economic Literature, 2010, vol. 48, issue 2, 281-355

Abstract: This paper provides an introduction and "user guide" to Regression Discontinuity (RD) designs for empirical researchers. It presents the basic theory behind the research design, details when RD is likely to be valid or invalid given economic incentives, explains why it is considered a "quasi-experimental" design, and summarizes different ways (with their advantages and disadvantages) of estimating RD designs and the limitations of interpreting these estimates. Concepts are discussed using examples drawn from the growing body of empirical research using RD. ( JEL C21, C31)

JEL-codes: C21 C31 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2010
Note: DOI: 10.1257/jel.48.2.281
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2443)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.aeaweb.org/articles.php?doi=10.1257/jel.48.2.281 (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to AEA members and institutional subscribers.

Related works:
Working Paper: Regression Discontinuity Designs in Economics (2009)
Working Paper: Regression Discontinuity Designs in Economics (2009)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:aea:jeclit:v:48:y:2010:i:2:p:281-355

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.aeaweb.org/journals/subscriptions

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Economic Literature is currently edited by Steven Durlauf

More articles in Journal of Economic Literature from American Economic Association Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Michael P. Albert ().