Costs and Benefits of Congestion in Two-Sided Markets: Evidence from the Dating Market
Camille Terrier and
Additional contact information
Tobias Lehmann: University of Lausanne
Rafael Lalive: University of Lausanne
No 964, Working Papers from Queen Mary University of London, School of Economics and Finance
Congestion is a widespread phenomenon in two-sided markets, but evidence on its costs and benefits is limited. Using data from an online dating platform, we document a large excess demand, or congestion, for some women. By exploiting exogenous variation in the number of men and women using the platform, we show that congestion slows down matching time for men. Congestion benefits women who screen men’s profiles quickly, by increasing their choice set. This asymmetry implies that policies aimed at reducing congestion can harm the side of the market that benefits from congestion.
Keywords: Congestion; two-sided markets; online platforms (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D4 D47 D62 D83 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-eur, nep-pay, nep-reg and nep-tre
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:qmw:qmwecw:964
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Working Papers from Queen Mary University of London, School of Economics and Finance Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Nicholas Owen ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).