EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Inefficient Lobbying, Populism and Oligarchy

Filipe Campante () and Francisco Ferreira ()

Working Paper from Harvard University OpenScholar

Abstract: This paper analyses the efficiency consequences of lobbying in a production economy with imperfect commitment. We first show that the Pareto efficiency result found for truthful equilibria of common agency games in static exchange economies no longer holds under these more general conditions. We construct a model of pressure groups where the set of efficient truthful common-agency equilibria has measure zero. Second, we show that under fairly general assumptions, the equilibrium will be biased against the group with the highest productivity of private capital, reflecting the fact that, on the margin, less productive groups find lobbying relatively more rewarding. Finally, as an application, if lobbies representing ?the poor? and ?the rich? have identical organizational capacities, we show that the equilibrium is biased towards the poor, who have a comparative advantage in politics, rather than in production. If the pressure groups differ in their organizational capacity, both pro-rich (oligarchic) and pro-poor (populist) equilibria may arise, all of which are inefficient with respect to the constrained optimum.

References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link)
http://scholar.harvard.edu/campante/node/248211

Related works:
Journal Article: Inefficient lobbying, populism and oligarchy (2007) Downloads
Working Paper: Inefficient lobbying, populism and oligarchy (2007) Downloads
Working Paper: Inefficient lobbying, populism and oligarchy (2004) Downloads
Working Paper: Inefficient lobbying, populism and oligarchy (2004) Downloads
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:qsh:wpaper:248211

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Paper from Harvard University OpenScholar Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Richard Brandon ().

 
Page updated 2019-11-14
Handle: RePEc:qsh:wpaper:248211