What Aspects of Formality Do Workers Value? Evidence from a Choice Experiment in Bangladesh
Krishna Kumar and
No WR-1197, Working Papers from RAND Corporation
In this study, we use a choice experiment to elicit workers' willingness to pay (WTP) for specific job benefits typically associated with formal employment (contracts, termination notice, paid leave, preferred working hours, and access to a retirement account). We find that workers most value job stability: the average worker would be willing to give up 19 percent of monthly income for a 6-month contract, 27 percent for a 1-year contract and 44 percent for a permanent contract (relative to no contract). Thirty days' of termination notice would also be valued at about 12 percent of monthly income. Using a latent class model, we explore preference heterogeneity and find that government workers are more likely to place a higher value on long-term contracts than private sector employees, while casual workers are more likely to have a particularly strong preference for higher salary, and a relatively low WTP for various benefits. This heterogeneity may be driven by sorting or loss aversion. Our work also lends support to the use of choice experiments to overcome the challenges associated with estimating WTP for specific job benefits from hedonic wage regressions or from observed job durations.
Pages: 39 pages
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-dcm, nep-hrm, nep-iue and nep-upt
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/working ... 1197/RAND_WR1197.pdf (application/pdf)
Working Paper: What Aspects of Formality Do Workers Value ? Evidence from a Choice Experiment in Bangladesh (2020)
Working Paper: What Aspects of Formality Do Workers Value? Evidence from a Choice Experiment in Bangladesh (2019)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ran:wpaper:wr-1197
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Working Papers from RAND Corporation Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Benson Wong ().