EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

What Aspects of Formality Do Workers Value? Evidence from a Choice Experiment in Bangladesh

Minhaj Mahmud, Italo A Gutierrez, Krishna B Kumar and Shanthi Nataraj

The World Bank Economic Review, 2021, vol. 35, issue 2, 303-327

Abstract: This study uses a choice experiment among 2,000 workers in Bangladesh to elicit willingness to pay (WTP) for job attributes: a contract, termination notice, working hours, paid leave, and a pension fund. Using a stated preference method allows calculation of WTP for benefits in this setting, despite the lack of data on worker transitions, and the fact that many workers are self-employed, which makes it difficult to use revealed preference methods. Workers highly value job stability: the average worker would be willing to forgo a 27 percent increase in income to obtain a one-year contract (relative to no contract), or to forgo a 12 percent increase to obtain thirty days of termination notice. There is substantial heterogeneity in WTP by type of employment and gender: women value shorter working hours more than men, while government workers place a higher value on contracts than do private-sector employees.

Keywords: informality; working conditions; choice experiment (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/wber/lhz046 (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
Working Paper: What Aspects of Formality Do Workers Value ? Evidence from a Choice Experiment in Bangladesh (2020) Downloads
Working Paper: What Aspects of Formality Do Workers Value? Evidence from a Choice Experiment in Bangladesh (2019) Downloads
Working Paper: What Aspects of Formality Do Workers Value? Evidence from a Choice Experiment in Bangladesh (2017) Downloads
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:wbecrv:v:35:y:2021:i:2:p:303-327.

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://academic.oup.com/journals

Access Statistics for this article

The World Bank Economic Review is currently edited by Eric Edmonds and Nina Pavcnik

More articles in The World Bank Economic Review from World Bank Oxford University Press, Great Clarendon Street, Oxford OX2 6DP, UK. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-22
Handle: RePEc:oup:wbecrv:v:35:y:2021:i:2:p:303-327.