The Limits of Social Recognition: Experimental Evidence from Blood Donors

Lorenz Goette and Egon Tripodi
Additional contact information
Lorenz Goette: University of Bonn, National University of Singapore
Egon Tripodi: Hertie School

No 369, Rationality and Competition Discussion Paper Series from CRC TRR 190 Rationality and Competition

Abstract: Does social recognition motivate prosocial individuals? We run large-scale experiments at Italy's main blood donors association, testing social recognition in social media and peer groups. We experimentally disentangle visibility concerns and peer comparisons, and study how exposure to different social norms affects giving. In three studies, we find that a simple ask to donate is at least as effective as offering social recognition. A survey experiment with blood donors indicates that social recognition backfires when offered to people that are already perceived as good citizens. Our results suggest that increasing visibility of good actions can backfire when perceived as image-seeking.

Keywords: prosocial behavior; blood donations; social recognition; natural field experiment; social media; WhatsApp (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C93 D91 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023-01-20
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://rationality-and-competition.de/wp-content/ ... ussion_paper/369.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:rco:dpaper:369

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Rationality and Competition Discussion Paper Series from CRC TRR 190 Rationality and Competition
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Viviana Lalli ().