Commitment Requests Do Not Affect Truth-Telling in Laboratory and Online Experiments
Tobias Cagala,
Ulrich Glogowsky,
Johannes Rincke and
Simeon Schudy
Additional contact information
Tobias Cagala: Deutsche Bundesbank
Johannes Rincke: University of Erlangen-Nuremberg
No 466, Rationality and Competition Discussion Paper Series from CRC TRR 190 Rationality and Competition
Abstract:
Using a standard cheating game, we investigate whether the request to sign a no-cheating declaration affects truth-telling. Our design varies the content of a no-cheating declaration (reference to ethical behavior vs. reference to possible sanctions) and the type of experiment (online vs. offline). Irrespective of the declaration's content, commitment requests do not affect truth-telling, neither in the laboratory nor online. The inefficacy of commitment requests appears robust across different samples and does not depend on psychological measures of reactance.
Keywords: cheating; lying; truth-telling; compliance; commitment; no-cheating rule; no-cheating declaration; commitment request (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C91 C93 D03 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023-11-27
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-cbe, nep-exp and nep-gth
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://rationality-and-competition.de/wp-content/ ... ussion_paper/466.pdf (application/pdf)
Related works:
Journal Article: Commitment requests do not affect truth-telling in laboratory and online experiments (2024) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:rco:dpaper:466
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Rationality and Competition Discussion Paper Series from CRC TRR 190 Rationality and Competition
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Viviana Lalli ().