Risk-Sharing in Village Economies Revisited

Tobias Broer and Tessa Bold

No 1232, 2015 Meeting Papers from Society for Economic Dynamics

Abstract: The limited enforcement model is popular for the analysis of village risk-sharing as it captures both the observed degree of insurance and the presumption that incomes are well observed but formal contracts absent in rural communities. Enforcement constraints in insurance contracts, however, typically bind only in case of positive income shocks, when the outside option of leaving the village is attractive. We show how this results in strongly counterfactual asymmetries in the consumption process at usual village sizes. When households can renege on informal contracts together with other villagers, however, the size of insurance groups becomes endogenous, and is usually much smaller than typical villages. This brings the predicted consumption process, which is more symmetric in small groups, in line with observed data. We thus argue that village risk-sharing should be replaced by neighbourhood, or kinship, risk-sharing.

Date: 2015
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-dge
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://red-files-public.s3.amazonaws.com/meetpapers/2015/paper_1232.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Working Paper: Risk-Sharing in Village Economies Revisited (2016)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:red:sed015:1232

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in 2015 Meeting Papers from Society for Economic Dynamics Society for Economic Dynamics Marina Azzimonti Department of Economics Stonybrook University 10 Nicolls Road Stonybrook NY 11790 USA. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Christian Zimmermann ().