 최근 Mega FTA SPS 규범의국제 논의 동향 및 시사점(Recent Regulatory Trends in Mega FTA SPS Chapters)Minji Kang ()
No 22-14, Policy Reference from Korea Institute for International Economic Policy Abstract: 본 연구에서는 우리나라가 기체결한 FTA의 SPS 규정을 살펴보고, Mega FTA 검역환경과 관련하여 CPTPP, RCEP, USMCA SPS 챕터 규범을 비교·분석하였으며, 이와 관련한 국내 법제 현황을 축산물 검역, 식물 검역, 수산물 검역, 식품 검역으로 나누어 검토하였다. 또한 Mega FTA 검역환경으로의 대응 방향, SPS 챕터에 대한 FTA 분쟁해결절차 적용, IPEF 농업 협상 및 기체결 FTA 개선협상에 대한 정책 시사점을 제시한다. Previous studies on mega Free Trade Agreement (FTA) Sanitary and Phytosanitary (SPS) provisions have primarily focused on the translation and preparation required for implementing the SPS regulations outlined in the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP). However, in order to gain a comprehensive understanding of the current state of SPS regulations in recent FTAs, this study goes beyond the CPTPP and also includes the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP), which is currently the largest FTA in existence and came into effect in Korea in February 2022. Additionally, the study compares these regulations with those of the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA). In addition to examining the SPS provisions of these mega FTAs, this study also investigates the status of domestic legislation related to SPS regulations in four specific areas: livestock quarantine, plant quarantine, fishery quarantine, and food quarantine. By conducting this analysis, the study aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the SPS chapter regulations in these mega FTAs as well as the domestic measures implemented in relation to SPS in the aforementioned sectors. Prior to the introduction of the Mega FTA, all of Korea’s bilateral FTAs included SPS provisions or chapters, but few included WTO Plus provisions. Furthermore, most bilateral FTAs specified that the dispute settlement procedures of the FTA would not be applicable to SPS provisions or chapters. The primary WTO SPS Plus provision found in these FTAs was the inclusion of an FTA SPS Committee, which served as a platform for bilateral discussions on SPS issues and facilitated information exchange. Additionally, depending on the FTA partner, FTA SPS chapters included WTO Plus provisions such as regionalization procedures, risk analysis in their own country, and cooperation on animal welfare. However, there has been a notable shift in this trend with the introduction of Mega FTAs. The SPS chapters of the CPTPP, the RCEP, and the USMCA have witnessed a significant increase in the number of provisions. On average, these mega FTAs contain 18.3 provisions in their SPS chapters, which is considerably higher than the average of 5.7 provisions found in Korea’s previously concluded FTAs. (the rest omitted) Keywords: SPS; Mega FTA; Quarantine; Sanitary Quarantine; Regionalization; Equality; Free Trade Agreement; CPTPP; Regionalization; Equivalence; FTA (search for similar items in EconPapers) Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ris:kiepre:2022_014 Access Statistics for this paper More papers in Policy Reference from Korea Institute for International Economic Policy [30147] 3rd Floor Building C Sejong National Research Complex 370 Sicheong-daero Sejong-si, Korea. Contact information at EDIRC. |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.