A Systematic Test of the Independence Axiom Near Certainty
Ritesh Jain () and
Kirby Nielsen ()
Additional contact information
Kirby Nielsen: Department of Economics, Stanford University, https://economics.stanford.edu/
No 20-A001, IEAS Working Paper : academic research from Institute of Economics, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan
A large literature has documented violations of expected utility consistent with a preference for certainty (the “certainty effect”). We design a laboratory experiment to investigate the role of the certainty effect in explaining violations of the independence axiom. We use lotteries spanning over the entire probability simplex to detect violations systematically. We find that violations of independence consistent with the reverse certainty effect are much more common than violations consistent with the certainty effect. Results hold as we test robustness along two dimensions: varying the mixing lottery and moving slightly away from certainty.
Keywords: : independence axiom; expected utility theory; certainty effect; Allais Paradox (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C79 D82 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 33 pages
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-cbe, nep-exp and nep-upt
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.econ.sinica.edu.tw/UpFiles/201309281717 ... 633/20-A001(all).pdf (application/pdf)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sin:wpaper:20-a001
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in IEAS Working Paper : academic research from Institute of Economics, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by HsiaoyunLiu ().