Understanding Italians’ Responses to Climate Change and Climate Policy

Luca Congiu, Manuela Coromaldi, Alessio D’Amato (), Loredana Mirra and Andrea Rampa
Additional contact information
Luca Congiu: University of Insubria; CEIS, University of Rome “Tor Vergataâ€
Manuela Coromaldi: Department of Economics, University of Rome Niccolò Cusano
Alessio D’Amato: University of Napoli Parthenope; Sustainability Environmental Economics and Dynamics Studies (SEEDS)

No 426, SEEDS Working Papers from SEEDS, Sustainability Environmental Economics and Dynamics Studies

Abstract: This paper presents an empirical analysis of Italian attitudes towards climate change and climate policies based on a comprehensive survey of 5,637 respondents. The study investigates the potential drivers of public support for various climate policies, including carbon taxes, product bans, and subsidies for green technologies, in light of public resistance observed in other countries. We use ordered probit models to address support for specific policy types and a multivariate probit model to explore the interdependencies across public opinions on taxes, bans, and subsidies. Our findings indicate that attitudes toward climate policy are primarily shaped by a combination of individual characteristics —such as political affiliation, climate change awareness, and personal intentions — and, to a lesser extent, by the respondents’ employment sector. We find that older individuals, those with left-leaning political views, and those with higher climate engagement are consistently more likely to support a broad range of climate policies. Conversely, individuals who deny climate change and those working in hard-to-abate industries show a certain opposition. The analysis also strongly highlights the importance of social equity, as concern about inequality is positively correlated with support to subsidies, while concerns about impacts on personal wage and wealth appear to reduce, in several cases, support to climate policies. Our multivariate analysis also reveals a high correlation across different policy types support, suggesting an underlying, unified view in favour (or against) climate action. Similarly to Douenne and Fabre (2022), our results highlight the importance of designing policies that are not only economically sound but also address social equity concerns, such as through targeted revenue recycling, to enhance public acceptability and mitigate potential resistance.

Pages: 38 pages
Date: 2026-02, Revised 2026-02
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-res
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sustainability-seeds.org/papers/RePec/srt/wpaper/0426.pdf First version, 2026 (application/pdf)
http://www.sustainability-seeds.org/papers/RePec/srt/wpaper/0426.pdf Revised version, 2026 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:srt:wpaper:0426

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in SEEDS Working Papers from SEEDS, Sustainability Environmental Economics and Dynamics Studies
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Alessandro Palma ().