The impact of robots on workplace injuries and deaths: Empirical evidence from Europe
Marco De Simone (),
Dario Guarascio and
Jelena Reljic
LEM Papers Series from Laboratory of Economics and Management (LEM), Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies, Pisa, Italy
Abstract:
This paper examines the impact of robotisation on workplace safety in EU manufacturing sectors between 2011 and 2019. To address endogeneity concerns, we employ an instrumental variable approach and find that robot adoption reduces both injuries and fatalities. Specifically, a 10% increase in robot adoption is associated with a 0.066% reduction in fatalities and a 1.96% decrease in injuries. Our findings highlight the context-dependent nature of these effects. The safety benefits of robotisation materialise only in high-tech sectors and in countries where industrial relations provide strong worker protections. In contrast, in traditional industries and countries with weaker institutional frameworks, these benefits remain largely unrealised. The results are robust to several sensitivity tests.
Keywords: EU; robotisation; technology; workplace safety; injuries; fatalities; industrial relations (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025-02-11
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-tid
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.lem.sssup.it/WPLem/files/2025-03.pdf (application/pdf)
Related works:
Working Paper: The impact of robots on workplace injuries and deaths:Empirical evidence from Europe (2025) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ssa:lemwps:2025/03
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in LEM Papers Series from Laboratory of Economics and Management (LEM), Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies, Pisa, Italy Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).