Access and Interconnection Pricing: How Efficient is the Efficient Component Pricing Rule?

Nicholas Economides () and Lawrence White

Working Papers from New York University, Leonard N. Stern School of Business, Department of Economics

Abstract: This paper critiques some of the properties of the so-called "efficient component pricing rule" (ECPR) for access to a bottleneck (monopoly) facility. When an entrant/rival and the bottleneck monopolist both produce a complementary component to the bottleneck service, the ECPR specifies that the access fee paid by the rival to the monopolist should be equal to the monopolist's opportunity costs of providing access, including any forgone revenues from a concomitant reduction in the monopolist's sales of the complementary component. We focus especially on the case in which the monopolist's price for the complementary component is above all relevant marginal costs. In this case the ECPR's exclusion of rivals may be socially harmful, since it may be preventing a substantial decrease in the price of the complementary component.

Date: 1995-10
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (69)

Downloads: (external link)
http://raven.stern.nyu.edu/networks/95-04.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Working Paper: Access and Interconnection Pricing: How Efficient is the Efficient Component Pricing Rule? (1997)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ste:nystbu:95-04

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from New York University, Leonard N. Stern School of Business, Department of Economics New York University, Leonard N. Stern School of Business, Department of Economics, 44 West 4th Street, New York, NY 10012-1126. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Amanda Murphy ().