The rise and fall of piecework-timework wage differentials: market volatility, labor heterogeneity, and output pricing
Robert Hart () and
No 2013-12, Stirling Economics Discussion Papers from University of Stirling, Division of Economics
Based on detailed payroll data of blue collar male and female labor in Britain's engineering and metal working industrial sectors between the mid-1920s and mid-1960s, we provide empirical evidence in respect of several central themes in the piecework-timework wage literature. The period covers part of the heyday of pieceworking as well as the start of its post-war decline. We show the importance of relative piece rate flexibility during the Great Depression as well as during the build up to WWII and during the war itself. We account for the very significant decline in the differentials after the war. Labor market topics include piecework pay in respect of compensating differentials, labor heterogeneity, and the transaction costs of pricing piecework output.
Keywords: Piecework - timework hourly pay differentials; output fluctuations; labor heterogeneity; output pricing (search for similar items in EconPapers)
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-his, nep-lab, nep-lma and nep-ltv
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Working Paper: The rise and fall of piecework-timework wage differentials: market volatility, labor heterogeneity, and output pricing (2014)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:stl:stledp:2013-12
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Stirling Economics Discussion Papers from University of Stirling, Division of Economics Division of Economics, University of Stirling, Stirling, Scotland FK9 4LA. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Liam Delaney ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).