Objectivity, Control and Adaptability in Corporate Governance

Arnoud Boot and Jonathan R. Macey ()
Additional contact information
Jonathan R. Macey: Cornell University

No 98-064/2, Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers from Tinbergen Institute

Abstract: Countries appear to differ considerably in the basic orientations oftheir corporate governance structures. We postulatethe trade-off between "objectivity" and "proximity" as fundamental tothe corporate governance debate. We stress thevalue of objectivity that comes with distance (e.g. the marketoriented U.S. system), and the value of better informationthat comes with proximity (e.g. the more intrusive ContinentalEuropean model).A superior corporate governance arrangement must balance thebenefits of proximity and objectivity. In this context,we also discuss the ways in which investors have "contracted around"the flaws in their own corporate governancesystems, pointing at the "adaptability" of different arrangements.

Date: 1998-06-04
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://papers.tinbergen.nl/98064.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:tin:wpaper:19980064

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers from Tinbergen Institute Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Tinbergen Office +31 (0)10-4088900 ().