Evidence on Informal Insurance in Rural Zimbabwe

Hans Hoogeveen ()
Additional contact information
Hans Hoogeveen: Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam

No 01-001/2, Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers from Tinbergen Institute

Abstract: The test on the presence of full insurance that is commonly employed does not take intoaccount that households also rely on buffer stocks to shield their consumption from incomeshocks. In this paper a test is developed that deals with this omission. It is shown that in thepresence of partial insurance, the common test on the degree of informal insuranceunderestimates the degree of protection offered by informal arrangements. This finding haspolicy implications because if the degree of informal insurance is partial, but highnonetheless, targeting of transfers (in case of drought for instance) is of less importancewhile transitory movement out of poverty is limited. In the empirical part the newlydeveloped test is employed for data on rural Zimbabwe. The presence of full insurance isrejected.

Date: 2001-01-15
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://papers.tinbergen.nl/01001.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:tin:wpaper:20010001

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers from Tinbergen Institute Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Tinbergen Office +31 (0)10-4088900 ().