EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Is there really a Green Paradox?

Frederick (Rick) van der Ploeg () and Cees Withagen

No 10-020/3, Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers from Tinbergen Institute

Abstract: This discussion paper resulted in a publication in the 'Journal of Environmental Economics and Management' , 2012, 64(3), 342-363. Optimal climate policy is studied in a Ramsey growth model with exhaustible oil reserves, an infinitelyelastic supply of renewables, stock-dependent oil extraction costs and convex climate damages. Weconcentrate on economies with an initial capital stock below that of the steady state of the carbon-freeeconomy and the initial cost of oil (extraction cost plus scarcity rent and social cost of carbon) below thatof renewables. There are then two regimes. If the oil stock is small, the social optimum path consists of aninitial oil-only phase followed by a renewables-only phase. With a lower cost of renewables or a lowerdiscount rate, more oil is left in situ and renewables are phased in more quickly. The optimal carbon taxrises along its development path during the oil-only phase, but the rise flattens off as less accessiblereserves are explored and the social cost of carbon increases. Subsidizing renewables without an optimalcarbon tax induces more oil to be left in situ and a quicker phasing in of renewables, but oil is depletedmore rapidly initially. The net effect on global warming is ambiguous. The second regime occurs if theinitial oil stock is large. The social optimum then consists of an initial oil-only phase followed with a finaloil-renewables phase. This regime converges to the steady state of the carbon-free economy as well. Thepaper also gives a full characterization of two other regimes that occur if the initial capital stock is aboveits steady state or renewables have an initial cost advantage.

Keywords: Green Ramsey model; carbon tax; renewables; exhaustible resources; global warming (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D90 E13 Q30 Q42 Q54 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2010-02-12, Revised 2012-08-27
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (51) Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link)
https://papers.tinbergen.nl/10020.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: Is there really a green paradox? (2012) Downloads
Working Paper: Is There Really a Green Paradox? (2010) Downloads
Working Paper: Is There Really a Green Paradox? (2010) Downloads
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:tin:wpaper:20100020

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers from Tinbergen Institute Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Tinbergen Office +31 (0)10-4088900 ().

 
Page updated 2019-04-20
Handle: RePEc:tin:wpaper:20100020