Measuring Responsiveness to Feedback as a Personal Trait

Thomas Buser, Leonie Gerhards and Joël J. van der Weele
Additional contact information
Leonie Gerhards: University of Hamburg, Germany
Joël J. van der Weele: University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands

No 16-043/I, Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers from Tinbergen Institute

Abstract: People typically update their beliefs about their own abilities too little in response to feed-back, a phenomenon known as “conservatism”, and some studies suggest that they overweight good relative to bad signals (“asymmetry”). We measure individual conservatism and asymmetry in three tasks that test different cognitive skills, and study entry into a winner-takes-all competition based on similar skills. We show that individual differences in feedback responsiveness explain an important part of the variation in confidence and competition entry decisions. Conservatism is correlated across tasks and predicts competition entry both by influencing beliefs and independently of beliefs, suggesting it can be considered a personal trait. Subjects tend to be more conservative in tasks that they see as more ego-relevant and women are more conservative than men. Asymmetry is less stable across tasks, but predicts competition entry by increasing self-confidence.

Keywords: Bayesian updating; feedback; confidence; identity; competitive behavior (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C91 C93 D83 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2016-06-03
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-cbe, nep-exp, nep-net and nep-neu
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (11)

Downloads: (external link)
https://papers.tinbergen.nl/16043.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:tin:wpaper:20160043

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers from Tinbergen Institute Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Tinbergen Office +31 (0)10-4088900 ().