Implied Volatility Sentiment: A Tale of Two Tails
Philip Stork,
Luiz Felix and
Roman Kräussl
Additional contact information
Luiz Felix: VU Amsterdam, The Netherlands
No 17-002/IV, Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers from Tinbergen Institute
Abstract:
Low probability events are overweighted in the pricing of out-of-the-money index puts and single stock calls. We show that such a behavioral bias is strongly time-varying and is linked to equity market sentiment and higher moments of the risk-neutral density. We find that our implied volatility (IV) sentiment measure, jointly derived from index and single stock options, explains investors' overweight of tail events well. Our IV-sentiment measure adds value over and above traditional factors in predicting the equity risk premium out-of-sample. When employed as a mean-reversion strategy, our IV-sentiment measure delivers economically significant results, which are more consistent than the ones produced by the conventional sentiment factor. We find that our contrarian investment strategy shows limited exposure to a set of cross-sectional equity factors, including Fama and French's five factors, the momentum factor and the low-volatility factor, and seems valuable in avoiding momentum crashes.
Keywords: Sentiment; implied volatility skew; equity-risk premium; reversals; predictability. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: G12 G14 G17 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2017-01-13, Revised 2018-01-26
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://papers.tinbergen.nl/17002.pdf (application/pdf)
Related works:
Journal Article: Implied volatility sentiment: a tale of two tails (2020) 
Working Paper: Implied volatility sentiment: A tale of two tails (2017) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:tin:wpaper:20170002
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers from Tinbergen Institute Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Tinbergen Office +31 (0)10-4088900 ().