EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Comparing Econometric Methods to Empirically Evaluate Job-Search Assistance

Paul Muller (), Bas van der Klaauw () and Arjan Heyma ()
Additional contact information
Bas van der Klaauw: VU Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Arjan Heyma: SEO Economic Research, The Netherlands

No 17-019/V, Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers from Tinbergen Institute

Abstract: We test whether different empirical methods give different results when evaluating job-search assistance programs. Budgetary problems at the Dutch unemployment insurance (UI) administration in March 2010, caused a sharp drop in the availability of these programs. Using administrative data provided by the UI administration, we evaluate the effect of the program using (1) the policy discontinuity as a quasi-experiment, (2) conventional matching methods, and (3) the timing-of-events model. All three methods use the same data to consider the same program in the same setting, and also yield similar results. The program reduces job finding during the first six months after enrollment. At longer durations, the quasi-experimental estimates are not significantly different from zero, while the non-experimental methods show a small negative effect.

Keywords: empirical policy evaluation; job-search assistance; unemployment duration (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: J64 C14 C31 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2017-02-10
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1) Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link)
https://papers.tinbergen.nl/17019.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Working Paper: Comparing Econometric Methods to Empirically Evaluate Job-Search Assistance (2017) Downloads
Working Paper: Comparing Econometric Methods to Empirically Evaluate Job-Search Assistance (2017) Downloads
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:tin:wpaper:20170019

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers from Tinbergen Institute Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Tinbergen Office +31 (0)10-4088900 ().

 
Page updated 2019-11-19
Handle: RePEc:tin:wpaper:20170019