Intertemporal Choice and Income Regularity: Non-Fungibility in a Lab-in-the-Field Experiment
Berber Kramer () and
David Kunst ()
Additional contact information
David Kunst: VU Amsterdam; Tinbergen Institute, The Netherlands
No 18-012/V, Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers from Tinbergen Institute
This paper tests whether the choice of when to be paid depends on the income type. A lab-in-the-field experiment in Kenya asked dairy cooperative members to allocate both an irregular windfall and their regular milk payments between two dates. Participants allocated the windfall to the earlier of the two dates, in line with theory, but allocated milk payments to the later date. Survey evidence suggests that allocations of regular dairy income were significantly more patient because farmers earmarked milk payments, but not the irregular windfall, for bulky expenditures. Given that compliance with informal contracts depends on whether the timing of payment aligns with recipient preferences, these findings have implications for contract design in rural value chains.
Keywords: time preferences; mental accounting; fungibility; collective marketing (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D03 Q13 O12 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-agr, nep-cta and nep-exp
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Working Paper: Intertemporal choice and income regularity: Non-fungibility in a lab-in-the-field experiment (2017)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:tin:wpaper:20180012
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers from Tinbergen Institute Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Tinbergen Office +31 (0)10-4088900 ().