Missing Observations in Observation-Driven Time Series Models
Francisco Blasques (),
Paolo Gorgi and
Siem Jan Koopman ()
Additional contact information
Paolo Gorgi: VU Amsterdam, The Netherlands
No 18-013/III, Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers from Tinbergen Institute
We argue that existing methods for the treatment of missing observations in observation-driven models lead to inconsistent inference. We provide a formal proof of this inconsistency for a Gaussian model with time-varying mean. A Monte Carlo simulation study supports this theoretical result and illustrates how the inconsistency problem extends to score-driven and, more generally, to observation-driven models, which include well-known models for conditional volatility. To overcome the problem of inconsistent inference, we propose a novel estimation procedure based on indirect inference. This easy-to-implement method delivers consistent inference. The asymptotic properties are formally derived. Our proposed method shows a promising performance in both a Monte Carlo study and an empirical study concerning the measurement of conditional volatility from financial returns data.
Keywords: missing data; observation-driven models; consistency; indirect inference; volatility (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C22 C58 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-ecm, nep-ets and nep-ore
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:tin:wpaper:20180013
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers from Tinbergen Institute Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Tinbergen Office +31 (0)10-4088900 ().