Unsecured and Secured Funding
Mario di Filippo (),
Angelo Ranaldo () and
Jan Wrampelmeyer ()
Additional contact information
Mario di Filippo: The World Bank
Jan Wrampelmeyer: Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
No 18-038/IV, Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers from Tinbergen Institute
We empirically investigate why wholesale funding is fragile by providing the first study of how individual banks borrow and lend in the euro unsecured and secured interbank market. Consistent with theories in which lenders enforce market discipline by monitoring counterparty credit risk and theories highlighting that secured loans are less informational sensitive, we find that banks with low credit worthiness replace unsecured borrowing with secured loans. Moreover, riskier lenders provide more secured loans to replace unsecured lending, which is not consistent with speculative or precautionary liquidity hoarding theories. Instead, lenders are precautionary in the sense that they prefer to lend against safe collateral.
Keywords: Liquidity hoarding; asymmetric information; counterparty credit risk; wholesale funding fragility; interbank market; liquidity (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: E42 E43 E58 G01 G21 G28 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-mac
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Working Paper: Unsecured and Secured Funding (2016)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:tin:wpaper:20180038
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers from Tinbergen Institute Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Tinbergen Office +31 (0)10-4088900 ().