EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

The Degree Ratio Ranking Method for Directed Networks

Rene van den Brink and Agnieszka Rusinowska
Additional contact information
Rene van den Brink: Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam

No 19-026/II, Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers from Tinbergen Institute

Abstract: One of the most famous ranking methods for digraphs is the ranking by Copeland score. The Copeland score of a node in a digraph is the difference between its outdegree (i.e. its number of outgoing arcs) and its indegree (i.e. its number of ingoing arcs). In the ranking by Copeland score, a node is ranked higher, the higher is its Copeland score. In this paper, we deal with an alternative to rank nodes according to their out- and indegree, namely ranking the nodes according to their degree ratio, i.e. the outdegree divided by the indegree. To avoid dividing by a zero indegree, we implicitly take the out- and indegree of the reflexive digraph. We provide an axiomatization of the ranking by degree ratio using a sybling neutrality axiom, which says that the entrance of a sybling (i.e. a node that is in some sense similar to the original node) does not change the ranking among the original nodes. We also provide a new axiomatization of the ranking by Copeland score using the same axioms except that this method satisfies a different sybling neutrality. Finally, we modify the ranking by degree ratio by not considering the reflexive digraph, but by definition assume nodes with indegree zero to be ranked higher than nodes with a positive indegree. We provide an axiomatization of this ranking by modified degree ratio using yet another sybling neutrality and a maximal property. In this way, we can compare the three ranking methods by their respective sybling neutrality.

Keywords: ranking method; degree ratio; Copeland score; directed graph; network; outdegree; indegree; axiomatization (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C02 D71 D85 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://papers.tinbergen.nl/19026.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Working Paper: The Degree Ratio Ranking Method for Directed Networks (2019) Downloads
Working Paper: The Degree Ratio Ranking Method for Directed Networks (2019) Downloads
Working Paper: The Degree Ratio Ranking Method for Directed Networks (2019) Downloads
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:tin:wpaper:20190026

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers from Tinbergen Institute Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Tinbergen Office +31 (0)10-4088900 ().

 
Page updated 2025-04-01
Handle: RePEc:tin:wpaper:20190026