Start-up Acquisitions and the Entrant’s and Incumbent’s Innovation Portfolios

Esmée Dijk, Jose Moraga-Gonzalez and Evgenia Motchenkova
Additional contact information
Esmée Dijk: Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam

No 23-047/VII, Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers from Tinbergen Institute

Abstract: An entrant and an incumbent engage in an investment portfolio problem where each chooses how to allocate its research funds across a rival market, where they compete with one another, and a non-rival market, where they do not interact. Allowing for acquisitions distorts both players’ incentives to allocate funding across their rival and non-rival projects. We show conditions under which the incumbent, anticipating the rents that accrue from the monopolization of the rival market, moves R&D resources from other markets to the rival market. This “incumbency for buyout effect” lowers the expected rents the entrant obtains from the contestable market, which gives it incentives to move its investment portfolio away from the rival market. We show that this strategic effect dominates the usual “innovation for buyout effect” when the entrant’s bargaining power is below a threshold. Allowing for acquisitions may improve the direction of innovation of each of the players as well as consumer surplus. Because precisely the shift of resources towards and away from non-rival projects causes the welfare gains and losses, using the traditional definition-of-the-market approach to assess the impact of acquisitions should be reconsidered.

Keywords: start-up acquisitions; innovation portfolios; direction of innovation; incumbency for buyout; innovation for buyout (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: L13 L41 O31 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023-08-03
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-com, nep-ent, nep-mic and nep-ppm
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://papers.tinbergen.nl/23047.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:tin:wpaper:20230047

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers from Tinbergen Institute Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Tinbergen Office +31 (0)10-4088900 ().