Too competitive to care? The overall explanatory power of personality for occupational gender segregation

Thomas Buser
Additional contact information
Thomas Buser: University of Amsterdam

No 26-037/I, Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers from Tinbergen Institute

Abstract: A large literature in behavioral and labor economics is concerned with documenting gender differences in personality traits, preferences and skills, as well as the explanatory power of these differences for gender gaps in occupational choice and career success. These studies usually focus on a single trait or personality classification, such as competitiveness, risk preferences, or the Big Five personality inventory. In this paper, I instead ask how much of gender differences in occupational sorting can be statistically explained by a comprehensive range of trait and preference measures jointly. I combine detailed indicators of economic preferences and personality traits elicited in a representative Dutch survey panel and link them to career outcomes for which large gender gaps are observed: the underrepresentation of women in management and math-intensive occupations, and the underrepresentation of men in teaching and caring occupations and the public sector. Correcting for measurement error, differences in preferences and personality can statistically explain a large part – typically half or more – of gender differences in occupational sorting. An unanticipated finding is that traits with a "dark" side – such as willingness to play dirty, externalizing behavior or psychopathy – capture a surprisingly large share of these gaps.

JEL-codes: D91 J16 J24 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2026-06-19
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://papers.tinbergen.nl/26037.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:tin:wpaper:20260037

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers from Tinbergen Institute Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Tinbergen Office +31 (0)10-4088900 ().