The Metric is the Message? How Inequality Metrics Shape Perceptions and Preferences for Redistribution

Ekaterina Siniakova, Oda Sund and Joël van der Weele
Additional contact information
Oda Sund: Nordic Institute for Studies in Innovation
Joël van der Weele: University of Amsterdam

No 26-050/I, Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers from Tinbergen Institute

Abstract: Inequality statistics highlight specific aspects of economic reality. Economists traditionally rely on technical indices such as the Gini coefficient, valued for their formal properties. More recently, scholars have emphasized measures like the income share of the Top 10%, which more directly evoke political conflict. We investigate whether inequality metrics shape public perceptions and support for redistribution, and how they are used in the media. In an online experiment (N = 1,246) among the general public, we show that "political'' measures reduce acceptance of inequality relative to the Gini coefficient, which itself has a desensitizing effect on fairness and emotional ratings. The behavioral effect of switching from the Gini to the Top 10\% share is quantitatively similar to switching 0.12-0.17 Gini points, e.g. from an equal society like the Netherlands to much more unequal Argentina. Academic experts and policy makers are less susceptible, but not immune to the metric effect, and predict a strong behavioral effect on the general public. Finally, we show that left-wing media are more likely to report top-share metrics and less likely to report the Gini coefficient than right-wing media, likely amplifying political divisions. Our findings show that inequality statistics do not merely describe economic reality, but shape normative assessments of the income distribution.

JEL-codes: C91 D63 P16 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2026-08-02, Revised 2026-08-07
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://papers.tinbergen.nl/26050.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:tin:wpaper:20260050

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers from Tinbergen Institute Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Tinbergen Office +31 (0)10-4088900 ().