Using Ethical Dilemmas to predict Antisocial Choices with Real Payoff Consequences: an Experimental Study

David Dickinson and David Masclet ()

Economics Working Paper Archive (University of Rennes & University of Caen) from Center for Research in Economics and Management (CREM), University of Rennes, University of Caen and CNRS

Abstract: Anti-social behaviours are costly to organizations, and the ability to identify predictors of such behaviours can be valuable. In this paper, we used a within-subjects laboratory design to study choices in the well-known (hypothetical) Trolley problem as well as in a real payoff money-burning experiment that can inform our understanding of moral preferences and antisocial behavior. Choices in both environments respond to incentives (i.e., the relative price of the ethical decision). Trolley problem decisions are consistent with previously known results—individuals prefer no action over action, and they prefer to avoid direct over indirect responsibility when negative consequences would be similar in either instance. In analyzing the determinants of anti-social money burning, our data identify money burning due to inequality aversion, but we also find evidence of pure nastiness (burning money of others to increase one’s advantageous inequality). Importantly, we find that willingness to commit ethically dubious acts in the Trolley problem significantly predicts money burning and, more specifically, nastiness. We conclude that choices in hypothetical environments can predict consequential and inefficient antisocial behaviours. Also, utilitarian behaviour in the Trolley dilemma is not linked to antisocial money burning, which contrasts with conclusions in the literature.

Keywords: experiments; money burning; ethical dilemmas; anti-social behavioral; trolley problem (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C90 C91 Z10 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018-06
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-cbe and nep-exp
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://ged.univ-rennes1.fr/nuxeo/site/esupversion ... -bd93092a94b5?inline (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: Using ethical dilemmas to predict antisocial choices with real payoff consequences: An experimental study (2019)
Working Paper: Using ethical dilemmas to predict antisocial choices with real payoff consequences: An experimental study (2019)
Working Paper: Using Ethical Dilemmas to Predict Antisocial Choices With Real Payoff Consequences: An Experimental Study (2018)
Working Paper: Using Ethical Dilemmas to predict Antisocial Choices with Real Payoff Consequences: an Experimental Study (2018)
Working Paper: Using Ethical Dilemmas to Predict Antisocial Choices with Real Payoff Consequences: An Experimental Study (2018)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:tut:cremwp:2018-06

Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
CREM (UMR CNRS 6211) - Faculty of Economics, 7 place Hoche, 35065 Rennes Cedex - France

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Economics Working Paper Archive (University of Rennes & University of Caen) from Center for Research in Economics and Management (CREM), University of Rennes, University of Caen and CNRS CREM (UMR CNRS 6211) – Faculty of Economics, 7 place Hoche, 35065 RENNES Cedex. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by GERMAIN Lucie ().