When Does Real Become Consequential in Non-hypothetical Choice Experiments?

Daniel Chavez, Marco Palma () and Rodolfo Nayga

No 20190306-001, Working Papers from Texas A&M University, Department of Economics

Abstract: The proneness of stated preference methods to hypothetical bias has increased the popularity of incentivized studies, in particular the use of real choice experiments (RCE). Challenges of RCE include the lack of engagement with the choice task by some subjects, and that some of the product alternatives may not be available in order to incentivize all the choices. This issue brings to question whether the proportion of available products influences the results of the RCE. Would the subjects' engagement change? Using an induced value choice experiment with a profit maximization optimal strategy for agents, we varied the number of potentially binding alternatives in four treatments. Our results suggest that incentives matter, as the percentage of optimal choices was lowest in the hypothetical treatment. Interestingly, however, we do not find statistically significant differences in the number of optimal choices between the incentivized treatments, regardless of the number of potentially binding alternatives used in our treatments. This suggests that practitioners could conduct incentivized RCE without the need to have all the product alternatives be made available in the study. Furthermore, we explore the interaction of incentives with subjects' numerical ability and individual reflective state. Both are also shown to influence how incentives impact performance, shedding some light on what individual characteristics to look for when conducting valuation research.

Keywords: Choice Experiments; Eye Tracking; Hypothetical bias; Induced values. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C18 C91 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 48 pages
Date: 2019-03-06
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-dcm, nep-exp and nep-upt
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://pvsessions.tamu.edu/RePEc/palma_when_does_real.pdf First version, 2019 (application/pdf)
Our link check indicates that this URL is bad, the error code is: 500 Can't connect to pvsessions.tamu.edu:443 (No such host is known. )

Related works:
Working Paper: When does real become consequential in non-hypothetical choice experiments? (2018)
Working Paper: When does real become consequential in non-hypothetical choice experiments? (2017)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:txm:wpaper:20190306-001

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from Texas A&M University, Department of Economics Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Pedro Bento ().