Incorrectly accounting for preference heterogeneity in choice experiments: what are the implications for welfare measurement?

Catalina M. Torres Figuerola, Sergio Colombo and Nick Hanley

No 65, DEA Working Papers from Universitat de les Illes Balears, Departament d'Economía Aplicada

Abstract: Gains from the incorporation of monetary values for changes in environmental goods and services within cost-benefit analysis depend on how well researchers can estimate these values. One key problem in both stated and revealed preference approaches is how best to model preference heterogeneity. Researchers have implemented several approaches to represent this heterogeneity, and have shown that the choice of approach can have an effect on welfare estimates. However, the question as to the degree of error in welfare measurement from an inappropriate choice of approach has not been addressed. We use Monte Carlo analysis to investigate this issue in the context of choice modelling of coastal water quality changes, when the researcher chooses between a random parameters and latent class model for representing heterogeneity. This allows us to quantify the errors that emerge from using the wrong model in estimating the benefits of water quality improvements. Our overall conclusion is smaller welfare errors are likely to come from use of a latent class model.

Keywords: choice experiments; cost-benefit analysis; Monte Carlo analysis; non-market goods; preference heterogeneity; welfare measurement (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C15 C52 Q51 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2014
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-agr and nep-dcm
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.uib.es/depart/deaweb/deawp/pdf/w65.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Working Paper: Incorrectly accounting for preference heterogeneity in choice experiments: what are the implications for welfare measurement? (2014)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ubi:deawps:65

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in DEA Working Papers from Universitat de les Illes Balears, Departament d'Economía Aplicada Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Xisco Oliver ().