 Delay is not the answer: waiting time in health care & income redistributionAmedeo Fossati and Rosella Levaggi Working Papers from University of Brescia, Department of Economics Abstract: In this paper, the use of delay as a tool to improve income redistribution is examined. We assume that people with the highest opportunity cost of waiting address their demand to the private market; if these, as we assume, are the ones at the higher end of the income distribution, they contribute through income tax, and pay for the private care they receive as well. Thus, public and private provision of health care, made mutually consistent within a utility-based approach by the presence of delay, may be used to modify income distribution. Our model modifies the results obtained by the current literature and shows that, when individual utilities are strictly quasi-concave and a cost-minimization framework is replaced by a Bergson-Samuelson welfare function maximisation, delay is no longer welfare improving. The reason is that, even when an optimum delay exists, the correspondent social maximum is a local maximum. The scope for using delay is then confined to environments where the Central Government’s power to tax is not sufficient to raise adequate resources or where, due to tax evasion or high tax distortions, second best tax instruments should be used. Date: 2008 Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ubs:wpaper:0801 Access Statistics for this paper More papers in Working Papers from University of Brescia, Department of Economics Contact information at EDIRC. |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.