Are better students really less overconfident? A preliminary test of different measures
Gianna Lotito,
Anna Maffioletti and
Marco Novarese
POLIS Working Papers from Institute of Public Policy and Public Choice - POLIS
Abstract:
In this work we use data from two sets of midterm exams and question-by-question evaluations of confidence levels and construct different indicators in order to study predictive ability and overconfidence. Our results show that (1) there is a significant evidence of a good ability of self-evaluation on the side of the best students; (2) worse metacognition does not seem to explain overconfidence. This suggests that different methods of investigating overconfidence might lead to results which are at least partially different from the ones discussed in the existing literature
Keywords: overconfidence; metacognition; predictive ability; performance (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: A22 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 16 pages
Date: 2014-10
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-cbe and nep-edu
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)
Downloads: (external link)
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1rJkGyAe32FbrKuESE ... lNM/view?usp=sharing (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:uca:ucapdv:177
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in POLIS Working Papers from Institute of Public Policy and Public Choice - POLIS
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Lucia Padovani ().