EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Identifying Reticent Respondents: Assessing the Quality of Survey Data on Corruption and Values

Omar Azfar and Peter Murrell

Electronic Working Papers from University of Maryland, Department of Economics

Abstract: Randomized response methods, which were designed to elicit candid answers to sensitive questions, have not succeeded in eliminating reticence in survey responses. We implement a methodology that effectively stands the randomized response technique on its head, using it to identify reticent respondents. In a sample of Romanian company officials, we identify a specific 10% of respondents as reticent with near certainty and estimate that roughly 40% of the whole sample were actually reticent. The identifiably reticent respondents admit to corruption interactions significantly less often than others do. They are also more likely to state that it is impermissible to break socially beneficial rules. We show that reticence is related to the respondent's age and the colonial heritage of the respondent's region. These results suggest some difficulties in making cross-country comparisons of corruption and of values using the types of survey data often employed in social science research and policy analysis.

Keywords: corruption; survey methods; randomized response; regulation; Romania (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D72 D82 H10 K40 N40 P51 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 38 pages
Date: 2005-12
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (11)

Downloads: (external link)
http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=870887 Main text (text/html)

Related works:
Journal Article: Identifying Reticent Respondents: Assessing the Quality of Survey Data on Corruption and Values (2009) Downloads
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:umd:umdeco:05-001

Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
Department of Economics, University of Maryland, Tydings Hall, College Park, MD 20742

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Electronic Working Papers from University of Maryland, Department of Economics Department of Economics, University of Maryland, Tydings Hall, College Park, MD 20742.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Peter Murrell ().

 
Page updated 2025-04-01
Handle: RePEc:umd:umdeco:05-001