OPTIMAL JOB DESIGN IN THE PRESENCE OF IMPLICIT CONTRACTS
Luis Vasconcelos () and
Arijit Mukherjee ()
FEUNL Working Paper Series from Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Faculdade de Economia
We characterize the optimal job design in a multitasking environment when the firms rely on implicit incentive contracts (i.e., bonus payments). Two natural forms of job design are compared: (i) individual accountability, where each agent is assigned to a particular job and assumes full responsibility for its outcome; and (ii) team accountability, where a group of agents share responsibility for a job and are jointly accountable for its outcome. The key trade-off is that team accountability mitigates the multitasking problem but may weaken the implicit contracts. The optimal job design follows a cut-off rule: firms with high reputation concerns opt for team accountability, whereas firms with low reputation concerns opt for individual accountability. Team accountability is more likely the more acute the multitasking problem is. However, the cut-off rule need not hold if the firm combines implicit incentives with explicit pay-per-performance contracts. JEL codes:
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (9) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Journal Article: Optimal job design in the presence of implicit contracts (2011)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:unl:unlfep:wp551
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in FEUNL Working Paper Series from Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Faculdade de Economia Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Susana Lopes ().