What matters in funding: The value of research coherence and alignment in evaluators' decisions
Sandra Barbosu (),
Michele Pezzoni () and
Additional contact information
Sandra Barbosu: Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
Michele Pezzoni: Université Côte d’Azur/CNRS/GREDEG, Nice, OST-HCERES, Paris, and ICRIOS, Bocconi University, Milan
No 2020-010, MERIT Working Papers from United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT)
Entrepreneurs, managers, and scientists participate in competitive selection processes to obtain resources. The project they propose is a crucial aspect of their success. In this paper, we focus on the selection of scientists applying for academic funding by submitting a research proposal. We argue that two core dimensions of the research proposal affect the probability of funding success: its coherence with the applicant's previous work, and its alignment with subjects of general interest for the scientific community. Employing a neural network algorithm, we analyse the text of 2,494 research proposals for a prestigious fellowship awarded to promising early-stage North American researchers. We find field-specific heterogeneity in the committees' evaluations. In life sciences and chemistry, evaluators value the research proposal's coherence positively with the scientist's recent work and the proposals' alignment with the current subject of general interest for the scientific community. Conversely, in physics, evaluators give more weight to bibliometric indicators and less to the proposal coherence and alignment. Our results can be extended beyond the academic context to managerial implications in cases such as entrepreneurs and managers submitting project proposals to investors
Keywords: Research trajectories; research funding; coherence; alignment (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I23 O32 O38 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-cfn, nep-cmp, nep-ppm and nep-sog
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Working Paper: What Matters in Funding: The Value of Research Coherence and Alignment in Evaluators’ Decisions (2021)
Working Paper: What Matters in Funding: The Value of Research Coherence and Alignment in Evaluators' Decisions (2020)
Working Paper: What Matters in Funding: The Value of Research Coherence and Alignment in Evaluators’ Decisions (2020)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:unm:unumer:2020010
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in MERIT Working Papers from United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT) Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Ad Notten ().