Social Exchange and Common Agency in Organizations
Robert Dur and
Hein Roelfsema ()
No 06-11, Working Papers from Utrecht School of Economics
Abstract:
We study the relation between formal incentives and social exchange in organizations where employees work for several managers and reciprocate to a manager's attention with higher effort. To this end, we develop a common agency model with two-sided moral hazard. We show that when effort is contractible and attention is not, the first-best can be achieved through bonus pay for both managers and employees. When neither effort nor attention are contractible, an `attention race' arises, as each manager tries to sway the employee's effort his way. While this may result in too much social exchange, the attention race may also be a blessing because it alleviates managers' moral-hazard problem inattention provision. Lastly, we derive the implications of these contract imperfections for the optimal number of managers that share one employee.
Keywords: social exchange; reciprocity; incentive contracts; common agency; organizational design (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2006
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-soc
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://dspace.library.uu.nl/bitstream/handle/1874/37088/06-11.pdf (application/pdf)
Related works:
Journal Article: Social exchange and common agency in organizations (2010) 
Working Paper: Social Exchange and Common Agency in Organizations (2008) 
Working Paper: Social Exchange and Common Agency in Organizations (2007) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:use:tkiwps:0611
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Working Papers from Utrecht School of Economics Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().