Should You Take a Lump-Sum or Annuitize? Results from Swiss Pension Funds
Monika Bütler () and
University of St. Gallen Department of Economics working paper series 2005 from Department of Economics, University of St. Gallen
We use a unique dataset on individual retirement decisions in Swiss pension funds to analyze the choice between an annuity and a lump sum at retirement. Our analysis suggests the existence of an "acquiescence bias", meaning that a majority of retirees chooses the standard option offered by the pensions fund or suggested by common practice. Small levels of accumulated pension capital are much more likely to be withdrawn as a lump sum, suggesting a potential moral hazard behavior or a magnitude effect. We hardly find evidence for adverse selection effects in the data. Single men, for example, whose money's worth of an annuity is considerably below the corresponding value of married men, are not more likely to choose the capital option.
JEL-codes: D91 H55 J26 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 36 pages
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-fin, nep-fmk and nep-pbe
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Working Paper: Should You Take a Lump-Sum or Annuitize? Results from Swiss Pension Funds (2005)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:usg:dp2005:2005-20
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in University of St. Gallen Department of Economics working paper series 2005 from Department of Economics, University of St. Gallen Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Joerg Baumberger ().