Should You Take a Lump-Sum or Annuitize? Results from Swiss Pension Funds

Monika Bütler () and Federica Teppa

No 5316, CEPR Discussion Papers from C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers

Abstract: We use a unique dataset on individual retirement decisions in Swiss pension funds to analyze the choice between an annuity and a lump sum at retirement. Our analysis suggests the existence of an 'acquiescence bias', meaning that a majority of retirees chooses the standard option offered by the pensions fund or suggested by common practice. Small levels of accumulated pension capital are much more likely to be withdrawn as a lump sum, suggesting a potential moral hazard behaviour or a magnitude effect. We hardly find evidence for adverse selection effects in the data. Single men, for example, whose money?s worth of an annuity is considerably below the corresponding value of married men, are not more likely to choose the capital option.

Keywords: Occupational pension; Lump sum; Annuity; Choice anomalies (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D91 H55 J26 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2005-10
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-cfn and nep-pbe
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (6)

Downloads: (external link)
https://cepr.org/publications/DP5316 (application/pdf)
CEPR Discussion Papers are free to download for our researchers, subscribers and members. If you fall into one of these categories but have trouble downloading our papers, please contact us at subscribers@cepr.org

Related works:
Working Paper: Should you Take a Lump-Sum or Annuitize? Results from Swiss Pension Funds (2005)
Working Paper: Should You Take a Lump-Sum or Annuitize? Results from Swiss Pension Funds (2005)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:5316

Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
https://cepr.org/publications/DP5316

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in CEPR Discussion Papers from C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers Centre for Economic Policy Research, 33 Great Sutton Street, London EC1V 0DX.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().