Who gives Direction to Statistical Testing? Best Practice meets Mathematically Correct Tests

Karl Schlag

Vienna Economics Papers from University of Vienna, Department of Economics

Abstract: We are interested in statistical tests that are able to uncover that one method is better than another one. The Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney rank-sum and the Wilcoxon sign-rank test are the most popular tests for showing that two methods are different. Yet all of the 32 papers in Economics we surveyed misused them to claim evidence that one method is better, without making any additional assumptions. We present eight nonparametric tests that can correctly identify which method is better in terms of a stochastic inequality, median difference and difference in medians or means, without adding any assumptions. We show that they perform very well in the data sets from the surveyed papers. The two tests for comparing medians are novel, constructed in the spirit of Mood's test.

JEL-codes: C12 C14 C90 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2015-10
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (7)

Downloads: (external link)
https://papersecon.univie.ac.at/RePEc/vie/viennp/vie1512.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:vie:viennp:vie1512

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Vienna Economics Papers from University of Vienna, Department of Economics
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Paper Administrator ().