How Important is Selection? Experimental vs Non-experimental Measures of Income Gains from Migration
David McKenzie,
John Gibson and
Steven Stillman
Additional contact information
Steven Stillman: Motu Economic and Public Policy Research
Working Papers in Economics from University of Waikato
Abstract:
Measuring the gain in income from migration is complicated by non-random selection of migrants from the general population, making it hard to obtain an appropriate comparison group of non-migrants. This paper uses a migrant lottery to overcome this problem, providing an experimental measure of the income gains from migration. New Zealand allows a quota of Tongans to immigrate each year with a lottery used to choose amongst the excess number of applicants. A unique survey conducted by the authors in these two countries allows experimental estimates of the income gains from migration to be obtained by comparing the incomes of migrants to those who applied to migrate, but whose names were not drawn in the lottery, after allowing for the effect of non-compliance among some of those whose names were drawn. We also conducted a survey of individuals who did not apply for the lottery. Comparing this non-applicant group to the migrants enables assessment of the degree to which non-experimental methods can provide an unbiased estimate of the income gains from migration. We find evidence of migrants being positively selected in terms of both observed and unobserved skills. As a result, non-experimental methods are found to overstate the gains from migration, by 9 to 82 percent. A good instrumental variable works best, while difference-in-differences and bias-adjusted propensity-score matching also perform comparatively well.
Keywords: migration; selection; natural experiment (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C21 F22 J61 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 47 pages
Date: 2006-03-31
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (57)
Downloads: (external link)
https://repec.its.waikato.ac.nz/wai/econwp/0603.pdf (application/pdf)
Related works:
Journal Article: How Important is Selection? Experimental VS. Non‐Experimental Measures of the Income Gains from Migration (2010) 
Journal Article: How Important Is Selection? Experimental vs. Non-Experimental Measures of the Income Gains from Migration (2010) 
Working Paper: How Important Is Selection? Experimental vs. Non-Experimental Measures of the Income Gains from Migration (2006) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wai:econwp:06/03
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Working Papers in Economics from University of Waikato Private Bag 3105, Hamilton, New Zealand, 3240. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Geua Boe-Gibson ().