How Important Is Selection? Experimental vs. Non-Experimental Measures of the Income Gains from Migration
David McKenzie,
John Gibson and
Steven Stillman
No 2087, IZA Discussion Papers from Institute of Labor Economics (IZA)
Abstract:
Measuring the gain in income from migration is complicated by non-random selection of migrants from the general population, making it hard to obtain an appropriate comparison group of non-migrants. This paper uses a migrant lottery to overcome this problem, providing an experimental measure of the income gains from migration. New Zealand allows a quota of Tongans to immigrate each year with a lottery used to choose amongst the excess number of applicants. A unique survey conducted by the authors in these two countries allows experimental estimates of the income gains from migration to be obtained by comparing the incomes of migrants to those who applied to migrate, but whose names were not drawn in the lottery, after allowing for the effect of noncompliance among some of those whose names were drawn. We also conducted a survey of individuals who did not apply for the lottery. Comparing this non-applicant group to the migrants enables assessment of the degree to which non-experimental methods can provide an unbiased estimate of the income gains from migration. We find evidence of migrants being positively selected in terms of both observed and unobserved skills. As a result, non-experimental methods are found to overstate the gains from migration, by 9 to 82 percent. A good instrumental variable works best, while difference-in-differences and bias-adjusted propensity-score matching also perform comparatively well.
Keywords: selection; natural experiment; migration (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C21 F22 J61 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 49 pages
Date: 2006-04
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (93)
Published - published in: Journal of the European Economic Association, 2010, 8(4), 913-945
Downloads: (external link)
https://docs.iza.org/dp2087.pdf (application/pdf)
Related works:
Journal Article: How Important is Selection? Experimental VS. Non‐Experimental Measures of the Income Gains from Migration (2010) 
Journal Article: How Important Is Selection? Experimental vs. Non-Experimental Measures of the Income Gains from Migration (2010) 
Working Paper: How Important is Selection? Experimental vs Non-experimental Measures of Income Gains from Migration (2006) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:iza:izadps:dp2087
Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
IZA, Margard Ody, P.O. Box 7240, D-53072 Bonn, Germany
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in IZA Discussion Papers from Institute of Labor Economics (IZA) IZA, P.O. Box 7240, D-53072 Bonn, Germany. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Holger Hinte ().