EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Using geographically weighted choice models to account for spatial heterogeneity of preferences

Wiktor Budzinski (), Danny Campbell (), Mikolaj Czajkowski (), Urška Demšar () and Nick Hanley ()
Additional contact information
Urška Demšar: University of St Andrews, School of Geography and Geosciences

No 2016-17, Working Papers from Faculty of Economic Sciences, University of Warsaw

Abstract: In this paper we investigate the prospects of using geographically weighted choice models for modelling of spatially clustered preferences. The data used in this study comes from a discrete choice experiment survey regarding public preferences for the implementation of a new country-wide forest management and protection program in Poland. We combine it with high-resolution geographical information system data related to local forest characteristics. Using locally estimated discrete choice models we obtain location-specific estimates of willingness to pay (WTP). Variation in these estimates is explained by the socio-demographic characteristics of respondents and characteristics of the forests in their place of residence. The results are compared with those obtained from a more typical, two stage procedure which uses Bayesian posterior means of the mixed logit model random parameters to calculate individual-specific estimates of WTP. The latter approach, although easier to implement and more common in the literature, does not explicitly assume any spatial relationship between individuals. In contrast, the geographically weighted approach differs in this aspect and can provide additional insight on spatial patterns of individuals’ preferences. Our study shows that although the geographically weighted discrete choice models have some advantages, it is not without drawbacks, such as the difficulty and subjectivity in choosing an appropriate bandwidth. We find a number of notable differences in WTP estimates and their spatial distributions. At the current level of development of the two techniques, we find mixed evidence on which approach gives the better results.

Keywords: discrete choice experiment; contingent valuation; willingness to pay; spatial heterogeneity of preferences; forest management; passive protection; litter; tourist infrastructure; mixed logit; geographically weighted model; weighted maximum likelihood; local maximum likelihood (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I38 Q23 Q28 Q51 Q57 Q58 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 40 pages
Date: 2016
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-agr, nep-dcm and nep-ecm
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.wne.uw.edu.pl/index.php/download_file/2764/ First version, 2016 (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: Using Geographically Weighted Choice Models to Account for the Spatial Heterogeneity of Preferences (2018) Downloads
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:war:wpaper:2016-17

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from Faculty of Economic Sciences, University of Warsaw Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Marcin Bąba ().

 
Page updated 2021-10-23
Handle: RePEc:war:wpaper:2016-17